HP Notebook

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 28%
Workstation 19%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.3%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80CC
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170413
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 14 '18 at 17:00
Run Duration100 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
29.3% Poor
SC Int 47.6
SC Float 38.3
SC Mixed 42.1
34% 42.7 Pts
QC Int 172
QC Float 132
QC Mixed 150
34% 151 Pts
MC Int 163
MC Float 134
MC Mixed 151
22% 149 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
HP(103C 80CC) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
3.12% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 13.9
Parallax 12.9
3% 11.5 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 7.7
Splatting 8.9
3% 7.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.12%
Great: 5%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNC128GCSJ 128GB
46GB free
Firmware: CJLA0201 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.4% Below average
Read 212
Write 151
Mixed 165
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 9.95
56% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 16.5
DQ Write 45.3
DQ Mixed 11.6
14% 24.5 MB/s
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 6.5
18% 6.43 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 7.5
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 56%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 9,486 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 27%
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $85
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $335Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $139
Intel Core i5-8600K $235AMD RX 480 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $160
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $170SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $51Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 16GB $18
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback