Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	55.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180122
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 14 '18 at 16:33
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	80.7% Excellent	Memory 73.4 1-Core 118 2-Core 236 78% 143 Pts	4-Core 473 8-Core 796 77% 634 Pts	64-Core 968 60% 968 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% PowerColor(148C 2378) CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.3.2 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Lighting 70.2 Reflection 69.7 Parallax 81.7 57% 73.9 fps	MRender 68 Gravity 68.1 Splatting 56.7 52% 64.3 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force LE200 SSD 240GB 4,783 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM10.8 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1299 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 355 (A2) Unknown 94 94 13 (AA) Unknown 100 100 185 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1310761 (AE) Unknown 100 100 23 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 23 (C2) HDA temperature 67 67 33 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 98 (F1) Unknown 100 100 5833 (F2) Unknown 100 100 11007	56.5% Above average	Read 467 Write 218 Mixed 322 74% 336 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 53.7 4K Mixed 6.14 83% 30.1 MB/s	DQ Read 26 DQ Write 47.2 DQ Mixed 5.83 13% 26.4 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 87%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 245GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 137 135 4125 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2517 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 74 74 19373 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1135 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 267 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2517 (C2) HDA temperature 89 82 54 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 6 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	53.8% Above average	Read 97.4 Write 89.9 Mixed 89.8 70% 92.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.72 4K Mixed 0.4 94% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 58%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 234GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 64 (03) Spinup time 185 181 1741 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3211 (05) Reallocated sector count 199 199 4 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5299 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2669 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 160 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 179 179 63153 (C2) HDA temperature 105 97 42 (C4) Reallocation count 197 197 3 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	38.1% Below average	Read 68 Write 64.6 Mixed 62.9 49% 65.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.22 66% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 43%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 69GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 176 450 (03) Spinup time 137 133 4150 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1243 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 2004 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 649 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 182 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1243 (C2) HDA temperature 90 83 53 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 198 16 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 198 16 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 15	53.7% Above average	Read 94.9 Write 92.1 Mixed 77.5 66% 88.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.29 76% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB 13,788 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	90.1% Outstanding	MC Read 35.3 MC Write 33.8 MC Mixed 29.5 94% 32.9 GB/s	SC Read 21.5 SC Write 32.5 SC Mixed 26.7 77% 26.9 GB/s	Latency 93.9 43% 93.9 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)