Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	22.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N450 2,527 User benchmarks, average bench 20% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Memory 31.6 1-Core 4.8 2-Core 8.4 13% 14.9 Pts	4-Core 11.2 8-Core 8.9 1% 10 Pts	64-Core 10.9 1% 10.9 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 36%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 103GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 683 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 94 (94) Unknown 255 255 0 (95) Unknown 255 255 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 8 (AA) Unknown 100 100 9 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 196618 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 255 255 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 47 (C2) HDA temperature 65 65 150324838435 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 102 (E7) Temperature 100 100 99 (E9) Unknown 100 100 415 (F1) Unknown 100 100 438 (F2) Unknown 100 100 666 (F4) Unknown 100 100 3 (F5) Unknown 100 100 10 (F6) Unknown 100 100 21300	22.8% Poor	Read 200 Write 110 Mixed 138 33% 149 MB/s	4K Read 9.96 4K Write 10.2 4K Mixed 3.61 25% 7.92 MB/s	DQ Read 22.9 DQ Write 16.2 DQ Mixed 2.79 7% 14 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 667 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	7.71% Terrible	MC Read 2.8 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 2.3 8% 2.63 GB/s	SC Read 0.4 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 0.6 3% 1.17 GB/s	Latency 245 16% 245 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.71% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16