Compaq-presario GC667AA-ABA SR5130NX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, RAM
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.1%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics40.1% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 7 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemCompaq-presario GC667AA-ABA SR5130NX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTek IVY
Memory0.5 GB free of 1.5 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1824 x 1026 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 14 '18 at 02:24
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 3800+-$150
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
SC Int 40.8
SC Float 29.3
SC Mixed 35.1
28% 35.1 Pts
QC Int 86
QC Float 59.5
QC Mixed 70.4
16% 72 Pts
MC Int 84.4
MC Float 59.8
MC Mixed 71.3
11% 71.8 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 17%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 Ti-$155
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
40.1% Average
Lighting 121
Reflection 84.8
Parallax 125
38% 110 fps
MRender 83.5
Gravity 119
Splatting 88.5
42% 97 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 43%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM0 12 HN-M500MB 500GB
104GB free
Firmware: 2BA3
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 88.7
Write 90.4
Mixed 93.8
69% 91 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.36
93% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 59%
Hitachi HDT725025VLA 250GB
101GB free
Firmware: V5DO
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 51.3
Write 34.8
Mixed 39.8
32% 42 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.19
75% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 34%
Take a copy of your results
Typical GC667AA-ABA SR5130NX Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%

System: Compaq-presario GC667AA-ABA SR5130NX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Very poor Total price: $150
The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $335Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $145
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $189AMD RX 480 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $140
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $198SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 16GB $18
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback