| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock B75M-DGS R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20131001 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 13 '18 at 19:34 |
| Run Duration | 154 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 43% |
PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
62.8%
Good
|
64% 103 Pts
|
27% 202 Pts
|
12% 202 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.1
|
28%
Poor
|
28% 28.3 fps
|
28% 35.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
54.1%
Above average
|
64% 86.2 MB/s
|
103% 0.98 MB/s
| |
|
|
42.3%
Average
|
48% 64.7 MB/s
|
84% 0.86 MB/s
| |
|
|
26.1%
Poor
|
30% 40.4 MB/s
|
44% 0.4 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown FLFE85F-C8KL9 85E3 51634xxxx68x6523xx 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
|
50.1%
Above average
|
49% 17.2 GB/s
|
40% 14.1 GB/s
|
61% 65.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical B75M-DGS R2.0 Builds (Compare 190 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock B75M-DGS R2.0 - $79
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 34x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 27x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 24x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 22x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 9x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 8x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 11% - Very poor | Total price: $179 |