Asus H81M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus H81M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150526
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 13 '18 at 18:03
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i3-4160-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
55.2% Above average
SC Int 98.7
SC Float 97.1
SC Mixed 93
77% 96.3 Pts
QC Int 234
QC Float 265
QC Mixed 259
57% 252 Pts
MC Int 244
MC Float 261
MC Mixed 272
39% 259 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203
EVGA(3842 1371) 1GB
CLim: 720 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (45 fps cap detected)
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 46.6
Reflection 47
Parallax 44.3
14% 46 fps
MRender 45.9
Gravity 46.9
Splatting 40.9
19% 44.6 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 19%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial M550 mSATA 128GB-$81
61GB free
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 341
Mixed 410
94% 422 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 30.7
153% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 59.7
121% 247 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 102%
Great: 100%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$88
3.5TB free
Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 5900 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 166
Write 133
Mixed 129
107% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 0.84
4K Mixed 0.15
54% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 16.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 61%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H81M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,266 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus H81M-PLUS - $68

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $553
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $175Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $110
Intel Core i5-8600K $239AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $116
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $177SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $911SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $58HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $226SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback