| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 22.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus M3A78-EM (all builds) |
| Memory | 6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20101008 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 13 '18 at 07:04 |
| Run Duration | 91 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom 9850
AM2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
51%
Above average
|
42% 62.7 Pts
|
20% 146 Pts
|
9% 148 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R7 260X-$120
PwrHis(1787 2339) 2GB
CLim: 1130 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.3.1
|
22.7%
Poor
|
22% 30.2 fps
|
23% 27.8 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
73.4%
Very good
|
103% 135 MB/s
|
89% 0.93 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
|
25%
Poor
|
24% 8.3 GB/s
|
17% 6 GB/s
|
46% 86 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M3A78-EM Builds (Compare 52 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M3A78-EM - $18
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 5x |
| Phenom II X2 550AMDBench 46%, 3,836 samples | 4x |
| Phenom II X4 940AMDBench 49%, 3,675 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 3200ATIBench 1%, 5,730 samples | 9x |
| GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 3x |
| HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $200 |