Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper A88X-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	10% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	99.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper A88X-CF (all builds)
Memory	3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140528
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 12 '18 at 17:28
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135 19,875 User benchmarks, average bench 45% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	Memory 78.9 1-Core 66.9 2-Core 123 55% 89.6 Pts	4-Core 200 8-Core 198 27% 199 Pts	64-Core 190 12% 190 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics + R7 200 Dual Graphics 318 User benchmarks, average bench 9% AMD(1002 0123) 1GB CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.2.1 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	10% Very poor	Lighting 11.8 Reflection 13.6 Parallax 15.1 10% 13.5 fps	MRender 13.6 Gravity 10.2 Splatting 14.9 11% 12.9 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 16290 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1206 (B1) Unknown 93 93 133 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 51 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 102 (F1) Unknown 99 99 19985214885	99.6% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 388 Mixed 412 97% 436 MB/s	4K Read 35.6 4K Write 78.8 4K Mixed 39.8 147% 51.4 MB/s	DQ Read 270 DQ Write 199 DQ Mixed 101 112% 190 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 99.6% Great: 115%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 177GB free Firmware: 15.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1850 (03) Spinup time 141 137 3950 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6644 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 71 71 21853 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5970 (C0) Power-off retract count 198 198 1562 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5081 (C2) HDA temperature 97 86 46 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 3	51.5% Above average	Read 96.6 Write 82.8 Mixed 89.3 68% 89.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.75 4K Mixed 0.41 99% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 69%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44 40,147 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 495GB free Firmware: 1AC0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 77 5 (03) Spinup time 91 91 3610 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 11717 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 1 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 30973 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 2 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6269 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 77 4 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 1 1 150 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 2538 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 54 588382243 (C2) HDA temperature 62 53 689045542 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 19772998 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 9 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0	30.2% Below average	Read 34.3 Write 70.9 Mixed 48.7 39% 51.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.14 4K Mixed 0.26 66% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 2133 C11 2x4GB 1,027 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 2132 MHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	44.5% Average	MC Read 20.1 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 18.6 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 7.9 SC Mixed 12.3 28% 9.77 GB/s	Latency 82.7 48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-G1.Sniper A88X-CF Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper A88X-CF

CPU
A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)AMD $467Bench 51%, 11,295 samples	14x
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	14x
A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $175Bench 43%, 12,658 samples	12x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	14x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	9x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x

SSD
Fury 120GBHyperX $160Bench 64%, 11,403 samples	5x
P3-512 512GBBench 75%, 2,855 samples	4x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x

RAM
F3 DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 41%, 3,080 samples	5x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 43%, 4,751 samples	4x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 34% - Below average

Total price: $627

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16