Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	29.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo P8600-$42 8,502 User benchmarks, average bench 37% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	39.1% Below average	Memory 66.9 1-Core 35.3 2-Core 68.1 38% 56.8 Pts	4-Core 68.5 8-Core 68.3 9% 68.4 Pts	64-Core 54.8 3% 54.8 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 42%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD 128GB-$84 8,513 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.0.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3767 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 409 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 135 (AE) Unknown 100 100 104 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 450 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 813 (F1) Unknown 100 100 17233267225 (F2) Unknown 100 100 11562987339	29.5% Poor	Read 236 Write 185 Mixed 190 45% 204 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 9.7 4K Mixed 4.01 27% 8.27 MB/s	DQ Read 32.8 DQ Write 9.51 DQ Mixed 3.59 7% 15.3 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.6% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 4.8 16% 5.47 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 5.6 15% 5.37 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16