Asus G30AB

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	44.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus G30AB (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G30AB
Memory	9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130705
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 10 '18 at 18:34
Run Duration	319 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120 172,887 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	78% Very good	Memory 90.3 1-Core 107 2-Core 208 78% 135 Pts	4-Core 355 8-Core 566 57% 460 Pts	64-Core 556 34% 556 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329 50,279 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Nvidia(10DE 105A) 3GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.1 Performing below potential (49^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	44.4% Average	Lighting 53.8 Reflection 48.6 Parallax 63.9 44% 55.5 fps	MRender 65.9 Gravity 58.4 Splatting 46.7 46% 57 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SC400S37256G 256GB 443 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: KD1ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 112 65428970 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 58952721125575 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1362 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 296 (B1) Unknown 0 0 10 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 28 75 64429424668 (C2) HDA temperature 28 75 64429424668 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 65428970 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 65428970 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 65428970 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 91 91 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 102320 (EA) Unknown 0 0 48338 (F1) Unknown 0 0 48338 (F2) Unknown 0 0 33688	83.8% Excellent	Read 505 Write 265 Mixed 279 77% 350 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 17.8 125% 51.5 MB/s	DQ Read 294 DQ Write 220 DQ Mixed 51.7 94% 189 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 90%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 25GB free Firmware: MS2OA7L0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 141 141 73 (03) Spinup time 125 125 12896895160 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3140 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 110 110 36 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 20735 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1361 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 3367 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 3367 (C2) HDA temperature 181 181 206159413281 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	67% Good	Read 116 Write 117 Mixed 106 85% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.49 4K Mixed 0.19 64% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 107%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB 31,808 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 528GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	52.1% Above average	Read 158 Write 95.1 Mixed 77.7 127% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1.07 4K Write 2.69 4K Mixed 0.41 110% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 63%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB 393 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 168GB free, PID ce21 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Read 11.6 Write 26.5 Mixed 7.18 21% 15.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.25 4K Write 1.12 4K Mixed 0.18 45% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 19%
Kingston DataTraveler G3 4GB 1,443 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 1643 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	6.76% Terrible	Read 23.1 Write 6.84 Mixed 10.5 14% 13.5 MB/s	4K Read 7.85 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.03 31% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 6.76% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GB 9,947 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 21.1 MC Mixed 16.8 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 19.1 SC Mixed 18.2 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 66.8 60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G30AB Builds (Compare 241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: Asus G30AB

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	209x
Core i5-4670KIntel $127Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	25x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	5x

GPU
GTX 760 (192-bit)NvidiaBench 20%, 10,656 samples	23x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	19x
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	18x

SSD
RBU-SC400S37128G 128GBKingstonBench 70%, 864 samples	37x
U100 128GBSandiskBench 38%, 2,261 samples	25x
RBU-SC400S37256G 256GBKingstonBench 77%, 443 samples	11x

RAM
MI64C1D1629Z1 2x8GBAdataBench 54%, 2,816 samples	56x
SLB304G08-GGNHM 2x8GBUnknownBench 55%, 513 samples	25x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 9,947 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $120

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16