Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Sail boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	13.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T9300-$70 3,287 User benchmarks, average bench 38% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	40.9% Average	Memory 71.3 1-Core 33.9 2-Core 66.2 39% 57.1 Pts	4-Core 64.9 8-Core 64.6 9% 64.8 Pts	64-Core 66.8 4% 66.8 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600-XT 296 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Fijitsu Siemens(1734 1107) 256MB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	2.18% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 5.08 Parallax 1.09 2% 2.86 fps	MRender 3.05 Gravity 0.93 Splatting 4.91 3% 2.96 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.18% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: XD0T Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	13.3% Very poor	Read 49.9 Write 29.3 Mixed 33.2 8% 37.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.46 4K Write 24 4K Mixed 6.95 28% 11.8 MB/s	DQ Read 7.61 DQ Write 29.8 DQ Mixed 7.61 9% 15 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 85%
WD WD2500BEVS-22UST0 250GB 10,566 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 27GB free Firmware: 100. Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	20.2% Poor	Read 36.6 Write 33.4 Mixed 15.6 21% 28.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.29 78% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 1024, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	14.1% Very poor	MC Read 5 MC Write 3.7 MC Mixed 3.7 12% 4.13 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 3.7 10% 3.6 GB/s	Latency 98.5 41% 98.5 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16