| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 2.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 39.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | Quanta TW9/SW9 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Intel Base Board Product Name |
| Memory | 2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20100906 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 10 '18 at 12:31 |
| Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
61.5%
Good
|
58% 89.7 Pts
|
27% 209 Pts
|
14% 230 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 425M
Quanta(152D 0852) 1GB
CLim: 560 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.1
|
2.82%
Terrible
|
3% 3.47 fps
|
3% 3.66 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 99U5469-035.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
22.3%
Poor
|
18% 6.17 GB/s
|
24% 8.27 GB/s
|
59% 67.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TW9/SW9 Builds (Compare 116 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Quanta TW9/SW9
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples | 39x |
| Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples | 28x |
| Core i5 M 450IntelBench 40%, 8,084 samples | 10x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 335MNvidiaBench 3%, 977 samples | 63x |
| GeForce GT 425MNvidiaBench 3%, 3,013 samples | 23x |
| GeForce GT 240MNvidiaBench 2%, 2,359 samples | 13x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $218 |