Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	47.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Gigabyte AB350M-Gaming 3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170407
Uptime	12.9 Days
Run Date	Mar 09 '18 at 12:04
Run Duration	107 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	24%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87 71,313 User benchmarks, average bench 61% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	62% Good	Memory 70 1-Core 91.6 2-Core 180 65% 114 Pts	4-Core 294 8-Core 407 44% 350 Pts	64-Core 395 24% 395 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% MSI(1462 3416) CLim: 1281 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	47.7% Average	Lighting 59.7 Reflection 65.1 Parallax 85.1 49% 70 fps	MRender 64 Gravity 51.5 Splatting 54 46% 56.5 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8000 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$100 2,434 User benchmarks, average bench 143% 160GB free (System drive) Firmware: C2.1.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	174% Outstanding	Read 1,526 Write 1,061 Mixed 1,036 268% 1,208 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 65.5 4K Mixed 40.3 130% 45 MB/s	DQ Read 224 DQ Write 96.5 DQ Mixed 77.6 79% 133 MB/s
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 174% Great: 181%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 747GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Read 147 Write 149 Mixed 156 114% 151 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 1.82 4K Mixed 0.3 98% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4-2400 CL16 8GB 2x8GB 2,791 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	65.9% Good	MC Read 26.5 MC Write 21.5 MC Mixed 23.4 68% 23.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 19.7 56% 19.6 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 1,267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 46%

Yacht

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF - $150

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	277x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	93x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples	84x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	122x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	82x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	82x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	40x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	34x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	27x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	57x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	49x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 46,470 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $521

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16