Asus P8P67

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	21.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 (all builds)
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121101
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 08 '18 at 15:23
Run Duration	227 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Memory 92.4 1-Core 82.2 2-Core 164 68% 113 Pts	4-Core 327 8-Core 327 44% 327 Pts	64-Core 328 20% 328 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Asus(1043 8422) 2GB CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.31 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	21.9% Poor	Lighting 25.9 Reflection 24.5 Parallax 32.5 21% 27.6 fps	MRender 34.3 Gravity 30.2 Splatting 23.8 24% 29.5 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215 19,372 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 6 0 6 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 16809 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2675 (E8) Unknown 100 100 41797952425 (E9) Unknown 94 0 94	102% Outstanding	Read 476 Write 374 Mixed 393 92% 414 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 36.7 153% 60.6 MB/s	DQ Read 330 DQ Write 298 DQ Mixed 121 144% 250 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 104%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2.5TB free Firmware: MX6O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 34359738368 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 4 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 4 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 4 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 4 (C2) HDA temperature 127 127 201865035823 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	112% Outstanding	Read 196 Write 193 Mixed 170 140% 186 MB/s	4K Read 1.17 4K Write 2.36 4K Mixed 0.22 117% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 108%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30 12,344 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 7GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 47 (03) Spinup time 141 140 3908 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1508 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 61 61 28535 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1475 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 95 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1412 (C2) HDA temperature 101 88 42 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 3	51.1% Above average	Read 98 Write 80 Mixed 94.7 69% 90.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.44 4K Mixed 0.31 81% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 76%
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB-$59 15,217 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 6GB free Firmware: PB3O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 144 144 90194313218 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 2176 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 11111 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1720 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 68 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 61027 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 193274511392 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	24.2% Poor	Read 44.3 Write 39.9 Mixed 40.2 31% 41.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 1.09 4K Mixed 0.2 55% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 42%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA330 1TB 8,831 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 1GB free Firmware: JP4O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 96 96 196613 (02) Throughput performance 135 135 97 (03) Spinup time 128 128 25789333796 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1743 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 136 136 32 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 12801 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1713 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1761 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1761 (C2) HDA temperature 122 122 304943988785 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	35.9% Below average	Read 60.2 Write 64.8 Mixed 56.3 45% 60.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.13 4K Mixed 0.28 73% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 76%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30 12,344 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 0GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 31 (03) Spinup time 138 136 4075 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1513 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 72 72 20549 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1488 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 124 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1388 (C2) HDA temperature 95 78 48 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 7 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 6 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 7	47% Average	Read 90.8 Write 72.2 Mixed 94.3 65% 85.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.84 4K Write 2.97 4K Mixed 0.41 136% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5673GB0-CH9 830B M2Y2GH64CB8HG6N-CG M378B5673GB0-CH9 830B M2Y2GH64CB8HG6N-CG 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	52.1% Above average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 16.4 51% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 15.3 SC Mixed 17.1 44% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 63.2 63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	444x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	357x
Core i7-2600Intel $195Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	199x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	117x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	103x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	95x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	49x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	46x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	38x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	34x
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 4,223 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $666

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16