Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 14% Tree trunk	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	19.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom x5-Z8350 9,056 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Memory 15 1-Core 15.2 2-Core 29.8 12% 20 Pts	4-Core 59.1 8-Core 63.3 8% 61.2 Pts	64-Core 58.8 4% 58.8 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 16,763 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 7270) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4364 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.96% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 1.59 1% 1.4 fps	MRender 1.19 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 1.61 1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.96% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk DF4064 63GB 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.1 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.4% Very poor	Read 148 Write 99.6 Mixed 117 27% 122 MB/s	4K Read 8.57 4K Write 12.3 4K Mixed 3.37 24% 8.08 MB/s	DQ Read 10.1 DQ Write 14.6 DQ Mixed 3.16 5% 9.27 MB/s

Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 19GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 39.5 Write 21.1 Mixed 16.4 29% 25.7 MB/s	4K Read 7.15 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.01 28% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix 1x4GB 8,928 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 4.6 14% 4.83 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 3.1 9% 3.03 GB/s	Latency 359 11% 359 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16