Asrock Z270M Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics34.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive304% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z270M Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory29.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '18 at 01:46
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Memory 89.9
1-Core 153
2-Core 305
99% 183 Pts
4-Core 557
8-Core 852
87% 705 Pts
64-Core 852
53% 852 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85CD) ≥ 4GB; ASUS ROG STRIX-GTX1050TI-4G-GAMING
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Lighting 43.8
Reflection 33.1
Parallax 40.5
36% 39.1 fps
MRender 44.9
Gravity 41
Splatting 37.9
33% 41.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
682GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
304% Outstanding
Read 2,228
Write 1,864
Mixed 1,734
432% 1,942 MB/s
4K Read 50
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 74.6
256% 94.6 MB/s
DQ Read 520
DQ Write 467
DQ Mixed 222
241% 403 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 304%
Great: 363%
WD Gold 10TB (2016)-$221
5.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01H02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 156
Write 153
Mixed 145
114% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.54
180% 2.09 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 133%
WD WD101KFBX-68R56N0 10TB
1TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 155
Write 139
Mixed 148
111% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.95
4K Write 4.55
4K Mixed 0.61
192% 2.04 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.1% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 21
72% 25 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 24
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270M Extreme4 Builds (Compare 225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock Z270M Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $673
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback