Supermicro X9SAE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro X9SAE  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9SAE
Memory28.6 GB free of 32.0156 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '18 at 22:17
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1225 V2-$200
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 96.8
2-Core 192
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 366
49% 367 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
MSI(1462 2842) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Lighting 40.3
Reflection 37.8
Parallax 48.4
33% 42.2 fps
MRender 49.6
Gravity 45.1
Splatting 38.4
36% 44.4 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 256GB
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 418
Write 218
Mixed 238
64% 291 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 36.8
4K Mixed 12.3
62% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 19.8
DQ Write 50.8
DQ Mixed 8.32
14% 26.3 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 237%
Transcend SSD320 128GB-$92
119GB free
Firmware: 5.0.4 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 199
Write 114
Mixed 129
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 16.4
81% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 8.1
40% 89.7 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 62%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
470GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 129
Write 112
Mixed 103
86% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.94
4K Write 2.38
4K Mixed 0.38
125% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 76%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
322GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 71.1
Write 53.7
Mixed 61.2
47% 62 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.87
4K Mixed 0.38
93% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
JSF51272AZ-1G6K1 Micron/Numonyx 25Q Series 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 0 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 16 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.6% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 17.9
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 17.9
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9SAE Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Supermicro X9SAE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $309
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback