HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3396
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '18 at 05:25
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3240
Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3240 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
57.1% Above average
Memory 81.6
1-Core 90.4
2-Core 131
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 211
26% 199 Pts
64-Core 236
15% 236 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
HP(103C 3396) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.55% Terrible
Lighting 1.63
Reflection 1.46
Parallax 1.28
1% 1.46 fps
MRender 3.38
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 3.22
2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.55%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
139GB free
Firmware: CC54 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 99.8
Write 89.1
Mixed 91.8
70% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.16
64% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
111GB free
Firmware: CC54 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 80
Write 85
Mixed 76.1
60% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.18
78% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
104GB free
Firmware: CC29 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 180
Write 121
Mixed 153
114% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.46
4K Mixed 0.2
69% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 102
Write 88.5
Mixed 97.2
72% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.27
4K Mixed 0.24
68% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
44GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 101
Write 91
Mixed 87.4
70% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 2.11
4K Mixed 0.35
102% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 62%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 1TB
62GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
25% Poor
Read 54
Write 57.2
Mixed 42.3
65% 51.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.29
62% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 25%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.4% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16.8
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 12
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 CMT Builds (Compare 2,753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback