Huanan X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Huanan X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset (all builds)
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170628
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 04 '18 at 17:25
Run Duration	232 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	59%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53 4,803 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	Memory 70.2 1-Core 56.8 2-Core 104 48% 76.9 Pts	4-Core 191 8-Core 358 33% 274 Pts	64-Core 781 48% 781 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	16.9% Very poor	Lighting 18.5 Reflection 19.3 Parallax 16.1 15% 17.9 fps	MRender 22.5 Gravity 25.6 Splatting 26.5 20% 24.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 540s Series 120GB 4,012 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: LSF036C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 371 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 726 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 111 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 42 47 94492360746 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 111 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 268764 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 0 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 0 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 89 89 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 268764 (F2) Unknown 100 100 234906 (F9) Unknown 100 100 4987 (FC) Unknown 100 100 51	84% Excellent	Read 508 Write 326 Mixed 262 80% 365 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 50 4K Mixed 35.7 111% 37.2 MB/s	DQ Read 208 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 87.7 95% 159 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 84%
Toshiba HDWD105 500GB-$49 9,420 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 410GB free Firmware: MS1OA8J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 70 (03) Spinup time 122 122 12897288379 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 556 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 115 115 34 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 145 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 73 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 555 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 560 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 171800002594 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	86.4% Excellent	Read 161 Write 140 Mixed 24.6 79% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.17 72% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 104%
Wilk 16GB 159 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 2GB free, PID 5500 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	8.34% Terrible	Read 33.3 Write 6.77 Mixed 10.9 17% 17 MB/s	4K Read 7.76 4K Write 0.06 4K Mixed 0.05 33% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.34% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4C 2x8GB 363 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	43% Average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 14.9 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.6 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 6.7 22% 7.57 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Huanan X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

CPU
Xeon E5-2680 v2IntelBench 71%, 1,619 samples	9x
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples	7x
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	11x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	5x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	4x

SSD
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GBBench 71%, 36,832 samples	3x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x

RAM
M393B5170FH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 676 samples	5x
KRE-D3U1600M/ Dimm2_Manufacturer KRE-D3U1600M/ Dimm4_Manufacturer KRE-D3U1600M/ Dimm6_Manufacturer KRE-D3U1600M/ 16GBDimm0_ManufacturerBench 98%, 15 samples	5x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16