Asus P8Z77-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 58% Gunboat	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	65.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	81.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151215
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 04 '18 at 16:24
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Memory 93.3 1-Core 112 2-Core 222 82% 142 Pts	4-Core 441 8-Core 444 59% 443 Pts	64-Core 441 27% 441 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Zotac(19DA 1438) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2252 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	65.7% Good	Lighting 82.2 Reflection 83.4 Parallax 72.3 67% 79.3 fps	MRender 82 Gravity 75.1 Splatting 75.6 63% 77.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41320RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 867 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 752 (A5) Unknown 100 100 19792132 (A6) Unknown 100 100 3 (A7) Unknown 100 100 36 (A8) Unknown 100 100 14 (A9) Unknown 100 100 216 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 7 (AE) Unknown 100 100 252 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 67 65 279174381601 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 317844357376 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 1624 (EA) Unknown 100 100 2670 (F1) Unknown 253 253 1931 (F2) Unknown 253 253 2150 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	81.7% Excellent	Read 495 Write 343 Mixed 325 86% 388 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 65.8 4K Mixed 18.8 108% 39 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 177 DQ Mixed 36.1 75% 154 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 101%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB 14,997 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 466GB free Firmware: JP2OA50E Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 95 (03) Spinup time 118 118 12897681601 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 6945 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 142 142 29 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 7905 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 5367 (C0) Power-off retract count 93 93 9108 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 93 93 9108 (C2) HDA temperature 200 200 253404250142 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	75.7% Very good	Read 131 Write 133 Mixed 124 97% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.47 4K Mixed 0.38 98% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 76%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 179 178 4025 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 412 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 454 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 288 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 97 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 196 196 14076 (C2) HDA temperature 117 107 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	57% Above average	Read 101 Write 97 Mixed 98.7 75% 98.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.88 4K Write 2.39 4K Mixed 0.28 112% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB 19,522 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	61.5% Good	MC Read 22.5 MC Write 22.7 MC Mixed 18.3 60% 21.2 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 18.8 54% 18.8 GB/s	Latency 61.3 65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-M PRO Builds (Compare 736 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-M PRO - $360

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	183x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	170x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	153x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	53x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	50x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	48x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	19x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	20x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 2,134 samples	15x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $650

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16