Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results


Gaming 118% UFO	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 104% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	139% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	69.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER (all builds)
Memory	29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171227
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 03 '18 at 22:00
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	87.9% Excellent	Memory 90.9 1-Core 144 2-Core 288 96% 174 Pts	4-Core 457 8-Core 793 76% 625 Pts	64-Core 783 48% 783 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 87.9% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Titan V 869 User benchmarks, average bench 140% Nvidia(10DE 1218) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1912 MHz, MLim: 425 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 391.5 Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	139% Outstanding	Lighting 190 Reflection 195 Parallax 268 155% 218 fps	MRender 188 Gravity 224 Splatting 109 136% 173 fps
Poor: 113% ↑ This bench: 139% Great: 155%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 107GB free Firmware: M0CR040 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 86 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1527 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 9 (AE) Unknown 100 100 97 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 72 57 184684511260 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 4656195022 (F7) Unknown 100 100 145719053 (F8) Unknown 100 100 68231307 (B4) Unknown 0 0 1940 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	84.3% Excellent	Read 484 Write 342 Mixed 340 86% 389 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 74 4K Mixed 24.8 111% 41.8 MB/s	DQ Read 298 DQ Write 179 DQ Mixed 14.5 71% 164 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 99%
Crucial_CT525MX300SSD1 240GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4109 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1923 (A8) Unknown 100 100 2 (AA) Unknown 100 100 171 (AD) Unknown 100 100 786465 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 140 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850984990 (DA) Unknown 100 100 2 (E7) Temperature 100 100 88 (F1) Unknown 100 100 5675	69.8% Good	Read 515 Write 327 Mixed 347 88% 396 MB/s	4K Read 32.3 4K Write 64.8 4K Mixed 9.58 95% 35.6 MB/s	DQ Read 32.7 DQ Write 74.7 DQ Mixed 9.61 20% 39 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 81%
GOODRAM 480GB 1,234 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 38GB free Firmware: SAFM01.7 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4088 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1908 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 1109 (AD) Unknown 100 100 3670141 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 106 (C2) HDA temperature 98 98 128850919454 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 99 (F1) Unknown 100 100 26352	60.6% Good	Read 527 Write 39.8 Mixed 86.5 46% 218 MB/s	4K Read 34.3 4K Write 90 4K Mixed 15.3 119% 46.5 MB/s	DQ Read 35 DQ Write 99.4 DQ Mixed 14.6 26% 49.7 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 130%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB 2,707 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2197 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.3% Average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 12.2 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 14.8 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 65.9 61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,308 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 69%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 58%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	1,761x
Core i5-6600KIntel $81Bench 72%, 342,244 samples	538x
Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	274x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	453x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	348x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	242x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	171x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	160x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	73x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	171x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	117x
Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GBHyperX $169Bench 83%, 37,519 samples	99x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $750

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16