Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	36.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z270-Phoenix Gaming
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z270-Phoenix Gaming-CF (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170424
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Mar 03 '18 at 19:41
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	88.1% Excellent	Memory 92.1 1-Core 134 2-Core 251 90% 159 Pts	4-Core 453 8-Core 682 70% 568 Pts	64-Core 744 46% 744 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	Lighting 47.8 Reflection 32.7 Parallax 44.6 39% 41.7 fps	MRender 39.5 Gravity 43.2 Splatting 37.9 33% 40.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
240gb SSD 240GB 2,356 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3.4 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 330 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 39 (A1) Unknown 100 100 0 (A4) Unknown 100 100 1340 (A5) Unknown 100 100 4 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 2 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 48 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 483 (F2) Unknown 100 100 492 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0 (F4) Unknown 100 100 0 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0 (FB) Unknown 100 100 0 (FC) Unknown 100 100 0 (FD) Unknown 100 100 0 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	68.7% Good	Read 452 Write 392 Mixed 292 84% 378 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 76.3 4K Mixed 2.99 83% 35 MB/s	DQ Read 80.9 DQ Write 105 DQ Mixed 5.37 28% 63.6 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 93%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 1,516 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 722GB free, PID 231a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	Read 106 Write 101 Mixed 6.61 81% 71.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.38 4K Write 5.83 4K Mixed 0.49 220% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL16-16-16 D4-2400 2x8GB 17,846 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.1% Average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 11.5 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 13.9 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 64 62% 64 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 86%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 46%

Yacht

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	4x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,148Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	4x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	2x

SSD
Z400s 128GBSanDisk $109Bench 61%, 10,807 samples	2x
512GB SSD 512GB3Bench 69%, 939 samples	2x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	2x

RAM
VMA45UH-MEC1U2AW2 2x16GBUnknownBench 86%, 354 samples	3x
Vengeance LED DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $161Bench 85%, 35,811 samples	3x
RZX-D4D17M2400B-16G 1x16GBUnknownBench 41%, 10 samples	2x

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $456

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16