Asrock AB350M Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (99th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 1 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	20.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock AB350M Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170303
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 03 '18 at 16:25
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X-$131 70,038 User benchmarks, average bench 66% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78% Very good	Memory 70.9 1-Core 115 2-Core 233 76% 140 Pts	4-Core 460 8-Core 641 69% 551 Pts	64-Core 640 40% 640 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% MSI(1462 3102) CLim: 1483 MHz, MLim: 1462 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	20.3% Poor	Lighting 25.2 Reflection 20 Parallax 23.5 20% 22.9 fps	MRender 29.1 Gravity 26.3 Splatting 19.4 20% 25 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MQ01ACF050 500GB-$150 24,380 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 661GB free Firmware: AV0A1C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1869 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2575 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 7057 (0A) Spinup retry count 151 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2375 (B7) Unknown 100 100 1682 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 65535 (BB) vendor-specific 96 96 4 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 48 471269404 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 384 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 3932220 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 28587 (C2) HDA temperature 72 48 471269404 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0	109% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 195 Mixed 172 139% 185 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 3.35 4K Mixed 0.45 139% 1.48 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 69%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 661GB free Firmware: AM001J Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1346 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 6877 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 1757 (0A) Spinup retry count 236 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3018 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 957 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 188 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 33594 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 197569085464 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 96 96 1684 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 173 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	109% Outstanding	Read 185 Write 193 Mixed 168 137% 182 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 3.48 4K Mixed 0.29 124% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 60%
Samsung MMCRE28G8MXP-0VBL1 128GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: VBM1EL1Q Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7119 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1723 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 86 86 810 (B2) Unknown 76 76 14 (B3) Unknown 98 98 73 (B4) Unknown 98 98 3767 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (E9) Unknown 1 1 1455131 (EA) Unknown 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (EC) Unknown 99 99 994 (ED) Unknown 99 99 1166 (EE) Unknown 100 100 0
Poor: 7% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSCK.8FBR 2x8GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	95.6% Outstanding	MC Read 38.2 MC Write 36.4 MC Mixed 32.3 102% 35.6 GB/s	SC Read 19.6 SC Write 32 SC Mixed 26 74% 25.9 GB/s	Latency 99.3 40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical AB350M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock AB350M Pro4 - $88

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	294x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	125x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	102x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	144x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	119x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	95x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	50x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	38x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	31x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	43x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	28x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $458

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16