Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	46.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180208
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 02 '18 at 03:55
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	66.4% Good	Memory 67.8 1-Core 101 2-Core 183 66% 117 Pts	4-Core 349 8-Core 615 58% 482 Pts	64-Core 767 48% 767 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% PowerColor(148C 2372) CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.6% Average	Lighting 56.7 Reflection 65.2 Parallax 72.9 46% 64.9 fps	MRender 65.3 Gravity 56.3 Splatting 54.3 48% 58.6 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingdian S400 120GB 1,721 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0919A0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 11 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 100 (A3) Unknown 100 100 23 (A4) Unknown 100 100 7395 (A5) Unknown 100 100 27 (A6) Unknown 100 100 4 (A7) Unknown 100 100 10 (A8) Unknown 100 100 7000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 9 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 49 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 7 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 11265 (F2) Unknown 100 100 9093 (F5) Unknown 100 100 12108	81.5% Excellent	Read 498 Write 445 Mixed 471 105% 471 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 76.6 4K Mixed 5.75 93% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 195 DQ Mixed 6.07 58% 134 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80 31,610 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 277GB free Firmware: 3.ADG Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 87 91707729 (03) Spinup time 96 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5930 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 288947980 (09) Power-on hours count 52 52 42711 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3774 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 51 606339108 (C2) HDA temperature 36 49 42949672996 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 74 51 49372716 (C5) Current pending sector count 99 99 31 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 99 99 31 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 9 162 91	43.2% Average	Read 75.9 Write 74.6 Mixed 75.2 57% 75.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.42 98% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 43%
Seagate ST3750630AS 750GB-$207 2,150 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 255GB free Firmware: DE13 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 109 99 24917428 (03) Spinup time 92 90 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2747 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 75 60 8665058055 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3846 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 12 (0C) Power cycle count 99 37 1843 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 65543 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 64 54 606339108 (C2) HDA temperature 36 46 34359738404 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 43 30 24917428 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -91740501434494 (F1) Unknown 100 253 919287449 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3604629158	41.6% Average	Read 82.1 Write 63.1 Mixed 78.9 56% 74.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.78 4K Mixed 0.35 70% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GB-$67 46,617 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	78.3% Very good	MC Read 30.8 MC Write 29.3 MC Mixed 27.3 83% 29.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 28.4 SC Mixed 21.9 59% 20.8 GB/s	Latency 107 38% 107 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,061

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)