Asus TS700-E8-RS8 V2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus TS700-E8-RS8 V2  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z10PE-D16 WS
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170310
Uptime11 Days
Run DateMar 01 '18 at 12:52
Run Duration90 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 77
1-Core 76
2-Core 146
59% 99.6 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 519
47% 396 Pts
64-Core 1,468
91% 1,468 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
100% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 145
Parallax 127
102% 132 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 134
Splatting 108
97% 119 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 100%
Great: 110%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI MegaSR 478GB
325GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.1% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 10.9
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 12
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TS700-E8-RS8 V2 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

System: Asus TS700-E8-RS8 V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $400
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback