Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2760QM-$130 10,423 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	68.3% Good	Memory 81.3 1-Core 87.4 2-Core 168 66% 112 Pts	4-Core 304 8-Core 404 45% 354 Pts	64-Core 400 25% 400 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 72%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia Quadro 1000M 6,108 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 21D1) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.62 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	3.46% Terrible	Lighting 4.23 Reflection 4.92 Parallax 3.5 4% 4.22 fps	MRender 5.9 Gravity 4.43 Splatting 3.04 4% 4.46 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.46% Great: 3%
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 21D1) 2GB Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	2.21% Terrible	Lighting 2.43 Reflection 4.58 Parallax 1.62 2% 2.88 fps	MRender 3.48 Gravity 1.33 Splatting 4.48 3% 3.1 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.21% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro 480GB-$199 9,250 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 309GB free (System drive) Firmware: X21200RL Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	64.1% Good	Read 484 Write 475 Mixed 467 106% 475 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 26.8 4K Mixed 9.23 50% 17.2 MB/s	DQ Read 16.5 DQ Write 34.5 DQ Mixed 8.77 11% 19.9 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8C-PB 4x8GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 16.6 MC Mixed 14.5 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 15.5 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 78.2 51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16