| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
| Graphics | 0.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP Presario CQ43 Notebook PC (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 3577 |
| Memory | 0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20110608 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 28 '18 at 03:38 |
| Run Duration | 205 Seconds |
| Run User | VEN-User |
| Background CPU | 46% |
PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD C-50
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz
|
22.9%
Poor
|
19% 24.2 Pts
|
3% 23.4 Pts
|
2% 23.9 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon HD 6250
HP(103C 3577) 384MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
|
0.57%
Terrible
|
0% 0.77 fps
|
1% 0.88 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$16
344GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0005HPM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
38.1%
Below average
|
38% 52 MB/s
|
65% 0.57 MB/s
| |
|
WD My Passport 0820 1TB
84GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
13.7%
Very poor
|
34% 26.4 MB/s
|
47% 0.58 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
9.69%
Terrible
|
9% 3.27 GB/s
|
5% 1.63 GB/s
|
21% 192 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Presario CQ43 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 92 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Presario CQ43 Notebook PC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2410MIntel $160Bench 48%, 46,742 samples | 22x |
| Core i3-2330MIntel $150Bench 47%, 20,066 samples | 17x |
| Celeron B815IntelBench 42%, 2,620 samples | 9x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 51x |
| HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples | 18x |
| Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples | 14x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 51% - Above average | Total price: $188 |