Toshiba Qosmio F60

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Toshiba Qosmio F60 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100720
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Feb 25 '18 at 23:51
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190 13,278 User benchmarks, average bench 54% rPGA988A Socket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	23.5% Poor	Memory 33.8 1-Core 22.5 2-Core 40.9 21% 32.4 Pts	4-Core 72 8-Core 182 14% 127 Pts	64-Core 106 6% 106 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M 7,697 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 0001) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	2.34% Terrible	Lighting 2.67 Reflection 4 Parallax 1.09 2% 2.59 fps	MRender 5.1 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 3.04 3% 3.35 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.34% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5251 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 866 (B1) Unknown 97 97 31 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 1 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 345 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7693935156	30.2% Below average	Read 245 Write 160 Mixed 172 43% 192 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 12.1 4K Mixed 5.77 34% 10.5 MB/s	DQ Read 13.7 DQ Write 13.1 DQ Mixed 5.75 6% 10.9 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	22% Poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 10.1 25% 8.73 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 1.9 6% 2.27 GB/s	Latency 233 17% 233 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Qosmio F60 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Qosmio F60

CPU
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples	28x
Core i5 M 430IntelBench 39%, 14,318 samples	16x
Core i7 M 620IntelBench 42%, 9,076 samples	12x

GPU
GeForce GT 330MNvidiaBench 2%, 7,697 samples	70x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	1x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	3x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	24x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	23x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $270

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16