| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20161130 |
| Uptime | 0.5 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 25 '18 at 20:27 |
| Run Duration | 82 Seconds |
| Run User | ARG-User |
| Background CPU | 20% |
PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
69.4%
Good
|
80% 138 Pts
|
38% 288 Pts
|
20% 327 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 355.82
|
16.5%
Very poor
|
17% 17.6 fps
|
16% 20.4 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
81.6%
Excellent
|
104% 139 MB/s
|
65% 0.67 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
37.4%
Below average
|
35% 12.2 GB/s
|
32% 11.3 GB/s
|
61% 65.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-H270-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 1,298 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 349x |
| Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 202x |
| Core i7-7700KIntel $241Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 199x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 197x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 152x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 131x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $383 |