Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	47.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100206
Uptime	6 Days
Run Date	Feb 25 '18 at 07:31
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 930-$199 19,497 User benchmarks, average bench 64% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Memory 93.8 1-Core 56.9 2-Core 129 59% 93.3 Pts	4-Core 226 8-Core 342 35% 284 Pts	64-Core 343 21% 343 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1200 4,005 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Nvidia(10DE 1140) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.90 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Lighting 17.5 Reflection 13.8 Parallax 15.1 14% 15.4 fps	MRender 20.5 Gravity 16.8 Splatting 14.4 14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTE256HMHP-000SO 256GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 120GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT45S0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5392 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2893 (B1) Unknown 99 99 99 (B3) Unknown 100 100 100 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 33 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 26 (EB) Unknown 99 99 90 (F1) Unknown 99 99 6377238047 (F2) Unknown 99 99 7578227951	47.8% Average	Read 226 Write 220 Mixed 172 46% 206 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 42.5 4K Mixed 14.6 81% 27.7 MB/s	DQ Read 27.6 DQ Write 48.2 DQ Mixed 13.6 17% 29.8 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 75%
WD WD8000AARS-00Y5B1 800GB 1,154 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 227GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 127 122 6608 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2585 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 11854 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2098 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 169 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 88 88 336772 (C2) HDA temperature 120 100 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	45.4% Average	Read 90.8 Write 67.1 Mixed 21.6 44% 59.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.13 64% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 57%
ASMT 2115 120GB 614 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 64GB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	36.5% Below average	Read 32.5 Write 29 Mixed 31 39% 30.8 MB/s	4K Read 7.61 4K Write 7.7 4K Mixed 4.23 434% 6.51 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 162%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 6 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.3% Below average	MC Read 11.7 MC Write 10.8 MC Mixed 9.9 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 8.3 24% 8.43 GB/s	Latency 60.3 66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-EX58-UD5 Builds (Compare 475 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	209x
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	48x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	30x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	33x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	30x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	24x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	23x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	20x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	17x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	71x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	65x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	49x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $390

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16