User System

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	. .
Motherboard	http://www.abit.com.tw/ IX38 QuadGT (Intel X38-ICH9R)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 7 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080509
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Feb 24 '18 at 15:41
Run Duration	209 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161 34,093 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Memory 84.5 1-Core 52.5 2-Core 102 52% 79.8 Pts	4-Core 205 8-Core 206 27% 205 Pts	64-Core 208 13% 208 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D6) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	31.5% Below average	Lighting 39.3 Reflection 31 Parallax 40.9 32% 37 fps	MRender 38.1 Gravity 37.8 Splatting 36.1 30% 37.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 330 Series 120GB-$188 11,188 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: 300i Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 2284923519038 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2322 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 2319 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 912725 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 97 97 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 912725 (F2) Unknown 100 100 836927 (F9) Unknown 100 100 30858	53% Above average	Read 260 Write 118 Mixed 170 40% 183 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 69.3 4K Mixed 17.9 100% 37.9 MB/s	DQ Read 157 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 43.2 58% 106 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 80%
Samsung HD403LJ 400GB-$183 4,107 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 160GB free Firmware: CT100-10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 253 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 7552 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6389 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 66003 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4202 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 0 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 52 29 (C2) HDA temperature 151 94 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 23419 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 1	35.8% Below average	Read 58.9 Write 65.8 Mixed 70.3 49% 65 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 1.22 4K Mixed 0.32 83% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 42%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 99GB free Firmware: 12.01C02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 177 176 6125 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 847 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 74 74 19353 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 835 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 400 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 847 (C2) HDA temperature 105 92 45 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	34.9% Below average	Read 61.3 Write 60 Mixed 60 46% 60.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.74 4K Mixed 0.37 91% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 94GB free Firmware: 12.01C01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 179 178 6008 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 976 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 69 69 23212 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 973 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 546 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1104 (C2) HDA temperature 108 93 42 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	37.7% Below average	Read 68.9 Write 62 Mixed 77 53% 69.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.89 4K Mixed 0.28 86% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 69%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70 66,332 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 47GB free Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 68854344 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 150 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 69 60 10020234 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1732 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 151 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 58 521404446 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 8 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 3613 (C2) HDA temperature 30 42 81604378654 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -8126078122542 (F1) Unknown 100 253 5874398452 (F2) Unknown 100 253 174901650212	88.4% Excellent	Read 128 Write 179 Mixed 118 106% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 1 247% 2.42 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 7GB 8,824 User benchmarks, average bench 24% null MHz 2048, 2048, 1024, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	27% Poor	MC Read 8.4 MC Write 8.6 MC Mixed 8.3 24% 8.43 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 8.2 23% 8.13 GB/s	Latency 72.6 55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

User System

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)