Asus ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170908
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '18 at 12:13
Run Duration375 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 70.8
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 195
68% 121 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 372
45% 344 Pts
64-Core 378
23% 378 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 375.63
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Lighting 43.8
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 36.3
36% 36.7 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 40
Splatting 34.9
30% 37.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
756GB free
Firmware: SBM3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 121
Write 99
Mixed 83.1
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.15
4K Write 5.82
4K Mixed 0.53
214% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 71%
WD WD5000KS-00MNB0 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: 08.02E08 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 71.9
Write 65.8
Mixed 66.3
51% 68 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 2.18
4K Mixed 0.43
115% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 40%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$16
430GB free
Firmware: 0003SDM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 74.8
Write 72.2
Mixed 72.4
55% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.17
4K Mixed 0.37
80% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 43%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 115
Write 98.4
Mixed 88.3
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.45
109% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
97GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 126
Write 3.28
Mixed 109
61% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 2.13
4K Mixed 0.43
109% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 43%
Seagate ST3320820AS 320GB-$55
97GB free
Firmware: 3.AHG Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 131
Write 53.1
Mixed 111
74% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.47
109% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (80th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79.4% Very good
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 27.2
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 28.2
SC Mixed 21.7
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 99.5
40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,841 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $469
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback