PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 1.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Pavilion dv9700 Notebook PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Quanta 30CB |
Memory | 1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20080616 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 24 '18 at 00:40 |
Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 82% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
30.4%
Below average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce 8600M GS
HP(103C 30CC) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.44
|
1.01%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
35.6%
Below average
|
||||
37%
Below average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
|
12.9%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Duo T7250Intel $97Bench 34%, 3,604 samples | 3x |
Core2 Duo T8100Intel $78Bench 35%, 2,639 samples | 2x |
Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-60AMD $28Bench 33%, 1,111 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce 8400M GSNvidiaBench 1%, 2,357 samples | 9x |
GeForce 8600M GSNvidiaBench 1%, 884 samples | 5x |
GeForce 7150M / nForce 630MNvidiaBench 0%, 388 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 45% - Average | Total price: $97 |