Asus MAXIMUS VI IMPACT

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS VI IMPACT (all builds)
Memory	13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140815
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 24 '18 at 00:03
Run Duration	86 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53 229,359 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	69.6% Good	Memory 95.7 1-Core 95.8 2-Core 159 72% 117 Pts	4-Core 253 8-Core 258 34% 256 Pts	64-Core 261 16% 261 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% PNY(196E 11C0) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Lighting 35.5 Reflection 25.7 Parallax 32 29% 31.1 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 32.9 Splatting 32.3 28% 34.5 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 28%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9387 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1676 (B1) Unknown 89 89 55 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 31 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 234 (F1) Unknown 99 99 24500663264	75.2% Very good	Read 487 Write 264 Mixed 276 75% 342 MB/s	4K Read 42 4K Write 65.5 4K Mixed 18 121% 41.8 MB/s	DQ Read 43.5 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 17.5 39% 75.5 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 122,541 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	MC Read 25.8 MC Write 26.8 MC Mixed 23.4 72% 25.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 21.1 SC Mixed 21.5 55% 19.3 GB/s	Latency 54.8 73% 54.8 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS VI IMPACT Builds (Compare 204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI IMPACT - $249

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	77x
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	36x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	30x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	21x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	13x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	12x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	12x
840 Evo 500GBSamsung $150Bench 103%, 68,337 samples	9x
840 Evo 1TBSamsung $199Bench 105%, 23,857 samples	7x

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 55%, 18,444 samples	13x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	12x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $493

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16