Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive92.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '18 at 10:06
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 90.2
1-Core 128
2-Core 246
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 627
63% 514 Pts
64-Core 626
39% 626 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 142
Parallax 130
112% 137 fps
MRender 107
Gravity 130
Splatting 104
92% 114 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 960GB
647GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 940
Write 402
Mixed 525
137% 623 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 17.2
4K Mixed 19.6
70% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 83.5
94% 163 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 291%
Intel SSDMCEAW180A4 180GB
158GB free
Firmware: DC33 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55% Above average
Read 262
Write 203
Mixed 225
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 19.6
81% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 51.1
71% 130 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 55%
Great: 75%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
46GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 501
Write 343
Mixed 425
94% 423 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 18.6
4K Mixed 20.8
69% 20.3 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 88.8
94% 157 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 372%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$105
3TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 146
Mixed 141
117% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 2.14
4K Mixed 0.24
95% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 99%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$53
1.5TB free
Firmware: JKAOA3MA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 116
Write 106
Mixed 109
83% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
87% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 69%
WD Green 6TB (2014)-$223
333GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 96.7
Write 165
Mixed 86.7
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 2.06
4K Mixed 0.19
76% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.9% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 16.4
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V FORMULA Builds (Compare 710 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $722
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback