Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom x7-Z8750 376 User benchmarks, average bench 27% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	34.2% Below average	Memory 53.6 1-Core 24.6 2-Core 49.6 29% 42.6 Pts	4-Core 90.7 8-Core 72.6 11% 81.6 Pts	64-Core 90.4 6% 90.4 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 16,763 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 7270) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4444 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.73% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 2.35 Parallax 2.31 2% 2.15 fps	MRender 2.67 Gravity 1.93 Splatting 3.39 2% 2.66 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.73% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung DJNB4R 125GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.7 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.5% Poor	Read 144 Write 70.6 Mixed 79.4 22% 98.1 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 24.8 4K Mixed 5.57 47% 16 MB/s	DQ Read 21.8 DQ Write 30.5 DQ Mixed 5.33 10% 19.2 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 39%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 125GB 65 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 28GB free, PID 140a Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Read 83.1 Write 9.68 Mixed 18.5 33% 37.1 MB/s	4K Read 6.87 4K Write 0.003 4K Mixed 0.006 26% 2.29 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix 2x4GB 11,918 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.8% Poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 9.2 25% 8.83 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 4.3 11% 3.93 GB/s	Latency 148 27% 148 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 87%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16