MSI 760G-P43(FX) (MS-7699))

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	MSI MS-7699
Motherboard	MSI 760G-P43(FX) (MS-7699)) (all builds)
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120716
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 22 '18 at 19:19
Run Duration	343 Seconds
Run User	LVA-User
Background CPU	44%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	63.1% Good	Memory 78.1 1-Core 19.7 2-Core 141 46% 79.7 Pts	4-Core 260 8-Core 425 42% 342 Pts	64-Core 428 26% 428 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199 77,943 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Asus(1043 0460) 2GB CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.12.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	29.6% Poor	Lighting 37.6 Reflection 33.8 Parallax 44.9 31% 38.8 fps	MRender 29.9 Gravity 31.1 Splatting 38 28% 33 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: 583ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 8710875 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 -33303176396446 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1506 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 19 (B1) Unknown 0 0 98 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 33 42 90197065761 (C2) HDA temperature 33 42 90197065761 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 8710875 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 8710875 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 8710875 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 95 95 1 (E9) Unknown 0 0 23639 (EA) Unknown 0 0 10524 (F1) Unknown 0 0 10524 (F2) Unknown 0 0 11905	28.9% Poor	Read 184 Write 110 Mixed 91.7 28% 128 MB/s	4K Read 7.85 4K Write 42.4 4K Mixed 7.79 44% 19.3 MB/s	DQ Read 22.3 DQ Write 60.3 DQ Mixed 7.24 15% 29.9 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 85%
Hitachi HUA722010CLA330 1TB-$39 10,195 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 237GB free Firmware: JP4OA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 93 (03) Spinup time 115 115 25791430986 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2851 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 138 138 31 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 19379 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1719 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2862 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2862 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 197569937445 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	56.4% Above average	Read 95.8 Write 101 Mixed 44.2 59% 80.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.34 83% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 76%
WD My Book 1140 2TB 10,094 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 385GB free, PID 1140 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	15% Very poor	Read 28.5 Write 25.7 Mixed 14 28% 22.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.66 4K Mixed 0.17 64% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 49%
Kingston DataTraveler SE9 USB 2.0 16GB-$5 1,670 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 9GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	7.14% Terrible	Read 19.9 Write 15 Mixed 17 22% 17.3 MB/s	4K Read 2.12 4K Write 0.16 4K Mixed 0.17 19% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.14% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GR1333D364L9/8G000 GR1333D364L9/8G000 16GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	42.1% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 15 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 10.5 26% 9.23 GB/s	Latency 84.1 48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MSI 760G-P43(FX) (MS-7699))

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)