Asus M2N-MX SE Plus

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M2N-MX SE Plus  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '18 at 18:57
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+
AM2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
39.8% Below average
Memory 67.1
1-Core 38.3
2-Core 76.8
40% 60.7 Pts
4-Core 76.3
8-Core 76.4
10% 76.4 Pts
64-Core 75.6
5% 75.6 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6150SE nForce 430
Asus(1043 8234) 128MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.9038
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2008)-$80
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 81.2
Write 77
Mixed 81.4
60% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.05
4K Mixed 0.28
90% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x1GB
1 of 2 slots used
1GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 4
12% 4.1 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 4
12% 4.3 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2N-MX SE Plus Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M2N-MX SE Plus

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 3% - Terrible Total price: $109
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback