| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus M4N68T-M (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit kolorów |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110705 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 22 '18 at 17:49 |
| Run Duration | 115 Seconds |
| Run User | POL-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
62.6%
Good
|
54% 84.1 Pts
|
29% 216 Pts
|
14% 222 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1210 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.2.2
|
21.4%
Poor
|
20% 28.2 fps
|
24% 28.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
62.6%
Good
|
80% 107 MB/s
|
88% 0.8 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FJK3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
63.3%
Good
|
82% 109 MB/s
|
106% 0.74 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
35%
Below average
|
34% 12 GB/s
|
22% 7.87 GB/s
|
58% 69.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M4N68T-M Builds (Compare 26 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M4N68T-M
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples | 3x |
| Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples | 3x |
| Athlon II X4 630AMDBench 45%, 7,197 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 3x |
| GeForce 7025 / nForce 630aNvidiaBench 0%, 5,527 samples | 3x |
| GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 34% - Below average | Total price: $129 |