Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom x5-Z8300 3,228 User benchmarks, average bench 24% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	26.4% Poor	Memory 43.3 1-Core 15.9 2-Core 30.9 22% 30 Pts	4-Core 56.4 8-Core 61.8 8% 59.1 Pts	64-Core 60.7 4% 60.7 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 16,763 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 7270) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4263 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.25% Terrible	Lighting 1.23 Reflection 2.12 Parallax 1.66 1% 1.67 fps	MRender 2.14 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 2.83 2% 2.03 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.25% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba 064G70 63GB 159 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.0 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	28.5% Poor	Read 152 Write 109 Mixed 110 28% 124 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 26.8 4K Mixed 8.43 50% 17.2 MB/s	DQ Read 19.5 DQ Write 37.4 DQ Mixed 7.83 12% 21.6 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix 1x4GB 8,928 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	20.1% Poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 6.7 21% 7.4 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 3.9 11% 3.87 GB/s	Latency 187 21% 187 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16