Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics60.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive49.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171019
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '18 at 20:28
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 93.3
1-Core 126
2-Core 246
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 733
76% 613 Pts
64-Core 736
46% 736 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.9% Good
Lighting 77
Reflection 76
Parallax 65.5
63% 72.8 fps
MRender 70.1
Gravity 68.7
Splatting 71
57% 69.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226
131GB free
Firmware: X41100RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 488
Write 253
Mixed 234
71% 325 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 19.2
4K Mixed 10.4
48% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 36.3
93% 200 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 107%
Crucial M4 64GB-$92
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 467
Write 108
Mixed 178
54% 251 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 61.9
4K Mixed 5.35
72% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 81.1
DQ Mixed 7.65
32% 72.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 65%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 138
Write 120
Mixed 129
98% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 2.39
4K Mixed 0.28
98% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 96%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$497
688GB free
Firmware: ST6OA3AA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 77.2
Write 70.1
Mixed 98.5
62% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.35
4K Mixed 0.28
79% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
306GB free
Firmware: CC4D Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 151
Write 175
Mixed 136
115% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.28
4K Mixed 0.29
83% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
74.4% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 21.6
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 22.3
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 61.3
65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback