Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP Compaq dc7900 Convertible Minitower (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3032h
Memory	2.9 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090305
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 21 '18 at 18:31
Run Duration	330 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8500-$110 18,841 User benchmarks, average bench 42% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.15 GHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	46.4% Average	Memory 78 1-Core 45.4 2-Core 90.5 46% 71.3 Pts	4-Core 88.9 8-Core 91 12% 89.9 Pts	64-Core 90.1 6% 90.1 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Zotac(19DA 1476) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Lighting 19.9 Reflection 15.3 Parallax 21 16% 18.7 fps	MRender 17 Gravity 19.2 Splatting 20.7 16% 19 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ccboot iSCSI 320GB 266GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	21.5% Poor	Read 95.2 Write 53.7 Mixed 74.8 16% 74.6 MB/s	4K Read 15.4 4K Write 17.9 4K Mixed 9.88 46% 14.4 MB/s	DQ Read 17 DQ Write 20.6 DQ Mixed 10.4 10% 16 MB/s

Ccboot iSCSI 1TB 138 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 156GB free Firmware: 0 Performing below potential (80^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	21.3% Poor	Read 95.2 Write 62.9 Mixed 74.7 17% 77.6 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 17.8 4K Mixed 9.66 42% 13.7 MB/s	DQ Read 16.5 DQ Write 21.1 DQ Mixed 10.1 10% 15.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 103%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 1GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Read 33 Write 7.63 Mixed 9.28 16% 16.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.76 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 0.75 83% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 40GB 7,939 User benchmarks, average bench 22% null MHz 2048, 2048, 36864 MB Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	22.8% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 6.7 20% 7.13 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 6.6 19% 6.57 GB/s	Latency 84.4 47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	55x
Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples	48x
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	35x

GPU
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples	63x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	10x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	7x

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $89

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16