PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Z200 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B40h |
Memory | 6.7 GB free of 12.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20100506 |
Uptime | 21.1 Days |
Run Date | Feb 21 '18 at 08:48 |
Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 21% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
50.8%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Nvidia(10DE 0995) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.76
|
20.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
44%
Average
|
||||
21%
Poor
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
26.6%
Poor
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 58x |
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 37x |
Xeon X3450IntelBench 66%, 3,425 samples | 29x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 19x |
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 17x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 16x |
SSD | |
---|---|
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples | 11x |
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples | 10x |
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 6x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 65% - Good | Total price: $152 |