Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics66.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive42.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '18 at 20:37
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Memory 95.9
96% 95.9 Pts
Poor: 71% Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
66.1% Good
Lighting 84.4
Reflection 85.6
Parallax 74.8
69% 81.6 fps
MRender 81.7
Gravity 76.3
Splatting 68
61% 75.3 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 194
Write 114
Mixed 124
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 82.2
4K Mixed 10.4
93% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 16.1
DQ Write 61.3
DQ Mixed 9.24
16% 28.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
1TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 159
Write 152
Mixed 164
120% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.21
72% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$57
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
MC Read 38
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 28.2
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 38.9
SC Mixed 30.3
88% 31 GB/s
Latency 54.4
74% 54.4 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270E GAMING Builds (Compare 6,553 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $966
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback