Gigabyte GA-X99-UD5 WIFI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics90.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-UD5 WIFI-CF  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '18 at 20:08
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 104
2-Core 178
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 636
58% 487 Pts
64-Core 831
51% 831 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.4% Outstanding
Lighting 105
Reflection 149
Parallax 127
86% 127 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 139
Splatting 113
99% 121 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme II 480GB-$192
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1311 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 467
Write 290
Mixed 268
75% 342 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 15.3
82% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 52.5
64% 112 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
104GB free
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 162
Write 126
Mixed 119
101% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.91
4K Mixed 0.19
70% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 105%
Seagate ST4000NM0033-9ZM170 4TB
26GB free
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 161
Write 115
Mixed 70.9
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.48
4K Write 2.05
4K Mixed 0.33
136% 1.29 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 105%
Seagate ST4000NM0033-9ZM170 4TB
20GB free
Firmware: SN03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 149
Write 143
Mixed 122
103% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 2.47
4K Mixed 0.4
127% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 105%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 2TB-$121
12GB free
Firmware: CV27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 98.3
Write 105
Mixed 130
84% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.25
72% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
15GB free
Firmware: JC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 71.3
Write 56.4
Mixed 61.1
47% 62.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.02
4K Mixed 0.27
70% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF51264AZ-2G1A1 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
MC Read 37
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 34.5
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 20.3
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X99-UD5 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD5 WIFI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $624
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback