| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 12.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus P5Q-VM DO (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20091102 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 20 '18 at 17:57 |
| Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
| Run User | SVK-User |
| Background CPU | 26% |
PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
52.1%
Above average
|
44% 66.9 Pts
|
22% 164 Pts
|
10% 166 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R7 250E
Sapphire(174B A001) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.150.2211.1001
|
11.7%
Very poor
|
11% 15.6 fps
|
12% 14.4 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
|
22.5%
Poor
|
20% 7.07 GB/s
|
19% 6.6 GB/s
|
46% 87.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5Q-VM DO Builds (Compare 5 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5Q-VM DO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 2x |
| Core2 Quad Q9500IntelBench 48%, 5,111 samples | 1x |
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 1x |
| GTX 650-TiNvidia $152Bench 14%, 36,698 samples | 1x |
| GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $89 |