MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	3.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	MSI MS-7885
Motherboard	MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) (all builds)
Memory	17.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160719
Uptime	5.7 Days
Run Date	Feb 20 '18 at 10:34
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103 50,196 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	88.3% Excellent	Memory 95.3 1-Core 116 2-Core 230 84% 147 Pts	4-Core 438 8-Core 678 69% 558 Pts	64-Core 862 53% 862 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 365B) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.46% Terrible	Lighting 4.23 Reflection 5 Parallax 3.5 4% 4.24 fps	MRender 5.81 Gravity 4.37 Splatting 3.09 4% 4.42 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.46% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 377GB free Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 12945 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 19 (B1) Unknown 99 99 10 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 60 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 6 (F1) Unknown 99 99 6320227054	113% Outstanding	Read 528 Write 496 Mixed 509 114% 511 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 39.2 153% 57.7 MB/s	DQ Read 340 DQ Write 321 DQ Mixed 167 170% 276 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 153GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8168 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 19 (B1) Unknown 99 99 38 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 60 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 3 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5274012464	114% Outstanding	Read 518 Write 499 Mixed 501 113% 506 MB/s	4K Read 37.4 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 41.4 163% 59.8 MB/s	DQ Read 322 DQ Write 281 DQ Mixed 122 141% 242 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 124%
WD WD2002FFSX-68PF8N0 2TB 932 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 1TB free Firmware: 81.00A81 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 134 134 6275 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 33 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 8160 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 18 (10) Unknown 0 200 8128987746 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 6 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 35 (C2) HDA temperature 112 106 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	99.7% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 179 Mixed 163 128% 170 MB/s	4K Read 0.91 4K Write 3.15 4K Mixed 0.47 149% 1.51 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 99.7% Great: 114%
Adata DashDrive Elite UE700 USB 3.0 64GB-$33 375 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 40GB free, PID de7a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	23% Poor	Read 85 Write 43.7 Mixed 17.6 52% 48.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.87 4K Write 0.22 4K Mixed 0.008 15% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 4x8GB-$165 7,179 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (97^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	121% Outstanding	MC Read 43.9 MC Write 54.1 MC Mixed 44.8 136% 47.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 19.6 SC Mixed 21.3 53% 18.6 GB/s	Latency 56.2 71% 56.2 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 882 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	396x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	244x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	56x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	104x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	91x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	53x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	30x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	18x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	17x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	34x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	23x
HyperX 2400 C15 4x8GBKingstonBench 82%, 9,100 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $371

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16