Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	58.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds)
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171109
Uptime	2.7 Days
Run Date	Feb 20 '18 at 09:09
Run Duration	220 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87 71,313 User benchmarks, average bench 61% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	68.3% Good	Memory 73.8 1-Core 98.8 2-Core 196 69% 123 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 540 54% 439 Pts	64-Core 540 33% 540 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3283) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	58.9% Above average	Lighting 73.5 Reflection 75.5 Parallax 65.6 60% 71.5 fps	MRender 70.9 Gravity 69.2 Splatting 69.1 57% 69.7 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 598 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 101 (64) Unknown 100 100 2664640 (65) Unknown 100 100 515600 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 3 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 96 96 1571 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 701 (B7) Unknown 97 97 24 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 100 163209871390 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 1 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 1 (E7) Temperature 96 96 4 (E9) Unknown 100 100 5009 (EA) Unknown 100 100 3020 (F1) Unknown 100 100 3758 (F2) Unknown 100 100 2947 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 1	56.3% Above average	Read 461 Write 191 Mixed 219 64% 290 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 36.4 4K Mixed 9.53 71% 23.9 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 77.3 DQ Mixed 6.41 39% 91.8 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 82%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 318GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 67 (03) Spinup time 135 135 34387198381 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 551 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 585 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 111 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 551 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 551 (C2) HDA temperature 166 166 188979675172 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	65.8% Good	Read 112 Write 117 Mixed 99 82% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1.01 4K Write 2.03 4K Mixed 0.22 105% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 70GB free Firmware: CC3C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 97 138592880 (03) Spinup time 93 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2989 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 78 60 56698711309 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 20158 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2903 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 34 34 66 (BC) Unknown 100 92 34360263154 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 36 1276244197411 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 275 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 3059 (C2) HDA temperature 35 64 -140737488355293 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 29 12 138592880 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -113395726528863 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2733862988 (F2) Unknown 100 253 4027271266	39.8% Below average	Read 69.9 Write 69 Mixed 67 52% 68.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 0.78 4K Mixed 0.41 82% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114 34,353 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 100GB free Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 80 64 93765609 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1433 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 72305993 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 -122243359176282 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 414 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 8590065666 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 55 571605022 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 778 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 91 91 18067 (C2) HDA temperature 30 45 60129542174 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -19950123088694 (F1) Unknown 100 253 17928829146 (F2) Unknown 100 253 10332445190	79.7% Very good	Read 129 Write 149 Mixed 120 100% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.88 4K Mixed 0.21 84% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 105%
WD Elements 25A1 3TB 4,338 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 952GB free, PID 25a1 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Read 36.4 Write 27.9 Mixed 6.83 27% 23.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.96 4K Write 0.94 4K Mixed 0.07 38% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FBD 2x8GB 5,007 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	96.2% Outstanding	MC Read 37.8 MC Write 35.4 MC Mixed 32.6 101% 35.3 GB/s	SC Read 23.1 SC Write 35.1 SC Mixed 27 81% 28.4 GB/s	Latency 92.8 43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 96.2% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,049 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	1,463x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	1,307x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	1,006x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	949x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	735x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	654x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	716x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	340x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	284x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	293x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	226x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	204x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $357

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16