Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA (all builds)
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130819
Uptime	5 Days
Run Date	Feb 20 '18 at 00:35
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	52%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Memory 94.8 1-Core 108 2-Core 200 79% 134 Pts	4-Core 332 8-Core 434 49% 383 Pts	64-Core 413 26% 413 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362 42,960 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 2843) 2GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	28.9% Poor	Lighting 35.2 Reflection 34.4 Parallax 43.5 29% 37.7 fps	MRender 39.8 Gravity 40.8 Splatting 29.4 29% 36.7 fps
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139 12,595 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: 400i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -60584807765273 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2615 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 1751 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1751 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 575653 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 55 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 575653 (F2) Unknown 100 100 730121 (F9) Unknown 100 100 20396	73.6% Very good	Read 485 Write 220 Mixed 243 69% 316 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 90.6 4K Mixed 13.5 111% 44.7 MB/s	DQ Read 233 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 14.2 64% 144 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 95%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 338GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 112 104 7400 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 12189 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 60 60 29422 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4219 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 375 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 170 170 91176 (C2) HDA temperature 122 86 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	42.3% Average	Read 77.2 Write 69.9 Mixed 70.2 54% 72.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.75 4K Mixed 0.31 85% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 57%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113 12,948 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 302GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 148 146 9591 (04) Start/Stop count 87 87 13818 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 63 63 27730 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4009 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 312 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 144 144 168367 (C2) HDA temperature 125 113 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	36.3% Below average	Read 60.7 Write 65.5 Mixed 73.9 51% 66.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.95 4K Mixed 0.25 79% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 135 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31% Below average	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 9.6 MC Mixed 8.9 27% 9.47 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 10 27% 9.3 GB/s	Latency 57.6 69% 57.6 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS V FORMULA Builds (Compare 710 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 59%

Gunboat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 49%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA - $349

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	396x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	105x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	63x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	58x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	56x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	44x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	30x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	24x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	20x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	19x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $722

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16