Sony VGN-CS190FE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 13% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

CPU throttled at 50% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Sony VGN-CS190FE (all builds)
Motherboard	Sony VAIO
Memory	1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colores, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20081117
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Feb 19 '18 at 21:03
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	1%
CPU Throttled	50%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Dual T3200 2,188 User benchmarks, average bench 32% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	31.6% Below average	Memory 60 1-Core 11.4 2-Core 22 25% 31.1 Pts	4-Core 22.3 8-Core 22.6 3% 22.5 Pts	64-Core 22.6 1% 22.6 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Sony(104D 903F) 829MB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.45% Terrible	Lighting 0.57 Reflection 0.46 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.51 fps	MRender 0.43 Gravity 0.37 Splatting 0.7 0% 0.5 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.45% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3265GSXN 320GB 2,380 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 282GB free (System drive) Firmware: GH101M Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1295 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2450 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 1809 (0A) Spinup retry count 148 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2442 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 124 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 69 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 18918 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 253403463714 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 25 (DE) Loaded hours 97 97 1462 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 293 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	41.8% Average	Read 77.7 Write 67.9 Mixed 80 57% 75.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.35 88% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 2.6 MC Mixed 2.9 9% 3.3 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 2.5 8% 2.9 GB/s	Latency 128 31% 128 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Sony VGN-CS190FE

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)